Summary
# Introduction to quality management systems
A quality management system (QMS) is a structured framework of documented policies, procedures, and responsibilities designed to achieve an organization's quality objectives and ensure customer satisfaction [1](#page=1).
### 1.1 Defining quality management systems
A quality management system (QMS) is defined as a collection of documented policies, procedures, and responsibilities, organized into a structured system of processes, and focused on achieving the company’s quality objectives. More formally, a QMS comprises all the organization’s policies, procedures, plans, resources, processes, and the delineation of responsibility and authority, all deliberately aimed at achieving product or service quality levels consistent with customer satisfaction and the organization’s objectives. These components collectively define how the organization operates and how quality is managed. A QMS is dynamic, capable of adapting to meet evolving customer needs and enhancing organizational efficiency and effectiveness [1](#page=1).
> **Tip:** Think of a QMS as the operational blueprint for how an organization consistently delivers products or services that meet or exceed customer expectations.
### 1.2 Essential documentation within a QMS
The documentation within a quality management system is crucial for ensuring consistency in operations and processes, and for verifying conformance. The key documents include [1](#page=1):
#### 1.2.1 Quality policy
This is a statement that outlines the organization's overall approach to quality [1](#page=1).
#### 1.2.2 Quality manual
This document addresses each clause of the ISO 9001 standard. It typically includes an organization chart to illustrate management's responsibilities for operating the quality system. Quality procedures may be integrated into the manual or referenced therein [1](#page=1).
#### 1.2.3 Quality objectives
These are specific goals related to quality that must align with the quality policy. Quality objectives are assigned to relevant organizational functions and levels and are monitored by top management [1](#page=1).
#### 1.2.4 Quality procedures
These documents provide step-by-step instructions on how the company fulfills its quality policy. At a minimum, a procedure is required for each ISO 9001 clause outlining specific requirements. Procedures may also exist for any process that can impact quality [1](#page=1).
#### 1.2.5 Forms, records, and other documentation
These items provide tangible evidence of the firm's activities, serving both internal verification and external auditor review purposes [1](#page=1).
### 1.3 Approaches to quality management systems
Two well-known quality management systems are Total Quality Management (TQM) and Six Sigma. These systems offer unified approaches and roadmaps for companies pursuing quality, rather than just being collections of tools. Official certificates are not issued for TQM or Six Sigma, unlike ISO 9000 which will be discussed separately [2](#page=2).
#### 1.3.1 Total Quality Management (TQM)
TQM is a people-focused management system aimed at the continual increase of customer satisfaction at continually lower real costs. It is a total system approach, integral to high-level strategy, working horizontally across functions and departments, involving all employees, and extending to the supply and customer chains. TQM emphasizes learning and adaptation to continuous change as critical for organizational success [2](#page=2).
The term TQM largely stems from the peak of the quality revolution, though some still use it while others prefer "performance excellence". TQM is characterized by its principles, practices, and techniques. Principles form the philosophical foundation, practices are the activities for implementing these principles, and techniques are the tools that enhance the effectiveness of practices. All three components must function cohesively [2](#page=2).
Historically, TQM's principles represented a significant shift from traditional management. Early management often neglected understanding external customer requirements and even those of internal customers. Products were often developed with a "build it and they will come" mentality rather than a "market in" approach focused on customer expectations. Management and specialists typically dictated production processes, with little employee input or teamwork. Waste and errors were often tolerated and managed through postproduction inspection [2](#page=2).
> **Example:** A traditional manufacturing company might focus on internal production targets, while a TQM-aligned company would prioritize understanding what a customer needs in a product and then design and produce it accordingly, involving employees at all levels in problem-solving and improvement.
---
# Total Quality Management (TQM) principles and practices
Total Quality Management (TQM) is a people-focused management system designed for the continual increase of customer satisfaction at continually lower real costs, integrating across all levels and functions of an organization and its supply chain [2](#page=2).
### 1.1 Evolution of TQM principles
The philosophies of Deming, Juran, and Crosby laid the groundwork for modern quality management. Initially, TQM was based on three core principles: customer focus, teamwork, and continuous improvement, which marked a departure from traditional management practices where customer needs were often overlooked and workers had little input. As the discipline evolved, TQM principles have expanded to include leadership, process approach, systems approach to management, factual approach to decision making, and mutually beneficial supplier relationships, reflecting a more comprehensive understanding of achieving organizational quality and excellence [2](#page=2) [3](#page=3) [4](#page=4).
### 1.2 Key TQM principles and practices
#### 1.2.1 Customer focus
The customer is recognized as the ultimate judge of quality. TQM emphasizes that all strategic decisions should be "customer-driven," aiming to build strong relationships that foster customer loyalty and advocacy. This involves understanding current and future customer needs, actively listening to and learning from customers, and measuring their satisfaction and engagement levels. TQM also extends the concept of customer to include internal customers (recipients of work within the organization) and even society, requiring organizations to be exemplary corporate citizens through ethical practices, concern for public health, safety, and the environment [4](#page=4).
* **Practices for customer focus:**
* Researching and understanding customer needs and expectations [4](#page=4).
* Ensuring goods and services align with customer needs [5](#page=5).
* Communicating customer needs throughout the organization [5](#page=5).
* Measuring customer satisfaction and using results for improvement [5](#page=5).
* Systematically managing customer relationships [5](#page=5).
* Balancing customer satisfaction with the needs of other stakeholders [5](#page=5).
#### 1.2.2 Leadership
Leadership for quality is the responsibility of top management, who must set strategic directions, establish clear quality values, and foster a customer orientation throughout the organization. Senior leaders are expected to personally commit to workforce development, encourage participation, learning, innovation, and creativity. Their active involvement in planning, performance reviews, and recognizing employee achievements serves as a role model, reinforcing quality values. A lack of commitment from top management can doom quality initiatives, whereas strong leadership from middle managers and the workforce can still foster a quality focus and drive improvement [5](#page=5).
* **Key practices for leaders:**
* Consider the needs of all stakeholders in decision-making [6](#page=6).
* Establish a clear organizational vision [6](#page=6).
* Set challenging goals and targets [6](#page=6).
* Create and sustain shared values, fairness, and ethics [6](#page=6).
* Establish trust and eliminate fear [6](#page=6).
* Provide adequate resources, training, and freedom to employees [6](#page=6).
* Inspire, encourage, and recognize worker contributions [6](#page=6).
#### 1.2.3 Involvement of people
An organization's success hinges on the knowledge, skills, and motivation of its workforce. TQM promotes a Theory Y approach to motivation, where workers are seen as self-motivated, responsible, and creative, requiring leadership and empowerment rather than close supervision. Employee engagement, characterized by a strong emotional bond to the organization and commitment to work, is crucial. Empowerment, the authority to make decisions and take risks, is a key component of engagement [6](#page=6).
* **Key practices for involving people:**
* Understand drivers of workforce engagement, satisfaction, and motivation [7](#page=7).
* Design work to promote communication, cooperation, skill sharing, and innovation [7](#page=7).
* Create a safe, healthy, and secure work environment [7](#page=7).
* Develop performance management systems based on compensation, recognition, and incentives [7](#page=7).
* Assess workforce engagement and satisfaction for improvement [7](#page=7).
* Assess and develop workforce capabilities and capacity [7](#page=7).
* Invest in development and learning for the workforce and leaders [7](#page=7).
* Manage career progression and succession planning [7](#page=7).
##### 1.2.3.1 Teamwork
TQM encourages and facilitates teamwork across the entire enterprise, viewing competitive behavior as contrary to its principles. Reward systems should recognize both individual and team contributions. Teamwork can be vertical (between management and employees), horizontal (within work groups and across functions), and interorganizational (with suppliers and customers) [7](#page=7).
* **Vertical teamwork:** Involves sharing responsibility and empowering employees to act on improvement ideas. Practices include recognizing accomplishments, sharing success stories, encouraging risk-taking, implementing effective suggestion systems, and providing financial and technical support [8](#page=8).
* **Horizontal teamwork:** Problem-solving and process improvement are best handled by cross-functional teams involving various departments, suppliers, and even customers [8](#page=8).
* **Interorganizational partnerships:** Building partnerships internally and externally, including with unions, suppliers, and educational organizations, to serve mutual and community interests. Strong supplier partnerships are vital for innovation, cost reduction, and improved quality [8](#page=8) [9](#page=9).
#### 1.2.4 Process approach
Work is viewed as a sequence of activities that achieve a result, transforming inputs into outputs that create value for customers. TQM sees the enterprise as a system of interdependent processes linked by collaborating suppliers and customers. Understanding processes improves the comprehension of the entire system, rather than focusing on isolated parts [10](#page=10) [9](#page=9).
* **Good practices for a process focus:**
* Systematically define processes that create desired outcomes [10](#page=10).
* Establish clear responsibility and accountability for managing key processes [10](#page=10).
* Analyze and measure process capability [10](#page=10).
* Identify interfaces within and between organizational functions [10](#page=10).
* Focus on factors that improve processes (resources, methods, materials) [10](#page=10).
* Evaluate risks and impacts of activities on stakeholders [10](#page=10).
#### 1.2.5 Systems approach to management
Achieving quality and market leadership requires a systems approach, involving synthesis, alignment, and integration of all organizational components. This means viewing the organization as a whole, ensuring consistency in plans, processes, measures, and actions, and integrating all components to deliver anticipated results. A systems perspective focuses on strategic directions, customers, and managing performance based on results, linking strategies with work systems and processes, and aligning resources for overall improvement [10](#page=10) [11](#page=11).
* **Practices for a systems approach:**
* Design the organization to achieve objectives effectively and efficiently [11](#page=11).
* Understand interdependencies between processes [11](#page=11).
* Develop approaches that harmonize and integrate processes [11](#page=11).
* Provide clear understanding of roles and responsibilities [11](#page=11).
* Define how specific activities and processes should operate [11](#page=11).
* Continually improve the system through measurement and evaluation [11](#page=11).
#### 1.2.6 Continual improvement
Continual improvement, encompassing both incremental and breakthrough changes, should be embedded in the management of all systems and processes. It involves learning from feedback, seeking to eliminate problems at their source, and being driven by opportunities to do better [11](#page=11).
* **Types of improvements:**
* Enhancing value to the customer through new and improved products/services [11](#page=11).
* Improving productivity and operational performance by reducing errors and waste [11](#page=11).
* Improving flexibility, responsiveness, and cycle time performance [11](#page=11).
* Improving organizational management processes through learning [11](#page=11).
##### 1.2.6.1 Customer needs classification (Kano Model)
Noriaki Kano's model categorizes customer needs into three classes:
* **Dissatisfiers:** Expected needs that, if absent, lead to dissatisfaction (e.g., basic safety features in a car) [12](#page=12).
* **Satisfiers:** Needs that customers explicitly state they want, leading to satisfaction (e.g., air-conditioning in a car) [12](#page=12).
* **Delighters/Exciters:** Unexpected and innovative features that create high perceptions of quality (e.g., early versions of antilock brakes). Over time, delighters become satisfiers, and satisfiers can become dissatisfiers if not met [12](#page=12).
##### 1.2.6.2 Improving work processes and cycle time
Improving work processes leads to reductions in defects and costs. Flexibility and responsiveness are critical in competitive markets, referring to the ability to adapt quickly to changing requirements. Cycle time, the duration of a process, is a key metric; reducing it improves customer response, streamlines processes by eliminating non-value-added steps, and drives simultaneous improvements in organization, quality, cost, and productivity. Agility characterizes flexibility and short cycle times [12](#page=12) [13](#page=13).
##### 1.2.6.3 Learning
Learning involves understanding why changes are successful through feedback, leading to new goals and approaches, typically in a four-stage cycle: planning, execution, assessment, and revision [13](#page=13).
* **Effective practices for continual improvement:**
* Deploy a systematic approach across the organization [13](#page=13).
* Provide training in improvement methods and tools [13](#page=13).
* Make continual improvement an objective for every individual [13](#page=13).
* Establish goals and measures for improvement [13](#page=13).
* Recognize and acknowledge improvements [13](#page=13).
#### 1.2.7 Factual approach to decision making
Measurements and sound analytical approaches provide objective data for learning and better decision-making, projecting trends and inferring cause-and-effect relationships. Organizations need performance measures tied to customer and company requirements to drive strategies, manage resources, and improve processes. Data and information are vital at all organizational levels, from real-time work-level data for root cause analysis to aggregated process-level data and highly aggregated organizational-level data for strategic planning [13](#page=13) [14](#page=14).
* **Key performance measures typically include:**
* Product and process outcomes [14](#page=14).
* Customer-focused outcomes [14](#page=14).
* Workforce-focused outcomes [14](#page=14).
* Leadership and governance outcomes [14](#page=14).
* Financial and market outcomes [14](#page=14).
Leading organizations leverage organizational knowledge from all stakeholders to drive learning and performance [14](#page=14).
* **Effective practices for managing data and knowledge:**
* Ensure data accuracy and reliability [14](#page=14).
* Make data accessible to those who need it [14](#page=14).
* Analyze data and information using valid methods [14](#page=14).
* Make decisions and take action based on factual analysis, balanced with experience and intuition [14](#page=14).
#### 1.2.8 Mutually beneficial supplier relationships
Suppliers are critical partners who can provide unique design, technology, or marketing capabilities essential for achieving strategic objectives like lower costs and improved quality. Strong supply chains were highlighted as crucial during disruptions like the 2011 Japan earthquake and tsunami, demonstrating their impact on production output and recovery. Companies excelling in supply chain operations often perform better financially, with supply chain leadership encompassing more than just cost and efficiency, but also the ability to shape and respond to demand shifts with innovative products and services [14](#page=14) [15](#page=15).
* **Effective practices for developing mutually beneficial supplier relationships:**
* Recognize the strategic importance of suppliers [15](#page=15).
* Identify and select key suppliers [15](#page=15).
* Develop win-win relationships balancing short-term gains with long-term considerations [15](#page=15).
* Establish trust through openness and honesty [15](#page=15).
* Pool expertise and resources with partners [15](#page=15).
* Maintain clear and open communication about information and future plans [15](#page=15).
* Establish joint development and improvement activities [15](#page=15).
* Inspire, encourage, and recognize supplier achievements [15](#page=15).
While all eight TQM principles are important, research suggests that leadership, customer focus, and workforce management practices are particularly strong predictors of organizational performance. Performance excellence, encompassing TQM concepts, is now considered a matter of survival in the business environment [15](#page=15).
---
# Six Sigma methodology and implementation
This section provides a comprehensive overview of the Six Sigma methodology, covering its origins, core principles, statistical underpinnings, implementation process through DMAIC, team roles, and project selection criteria.
### 3.1 Understanding Six Sigma
Six Sigma is a business improvement approach aimed at identifying and eliminating the root causes of defects and errors in manufacturing and service processes. It achieves this by focusing on outputs that are critical to customers and generating a clear financial return for the organization. The statistical benchmark for Six Sigma is 3.4 or fewer errors or defects per million opportunities (dpmo). The ultimate objective for organizations adopting Six Sigma is to reach this capability level in all critical processes [15](#page=15) [16](#page=16).
#### 3.1.1 Evolution of Six Sigma
Motorola is credited with pioneering the Six Sigma concept in the mid-1980s, with engineer Bill Smith developing the idea to address higher-than-predicted system failure rates. Smith's proposal led Motorola to set ambitious quality improvement goals, including achieving six-sigma capability by 1992. While Motorola initiated the concept, General Electric (GE) significantly boosted its popularity through extensive implementation efforts led by then-CEO Jack Welch in the mid-1990s. GE's commitment included substantial investments in training and a restructuring of incentive compensation to prioritize Six Sigma initiatives. GE reported significant financial savings and performance improvements across various business units as a result of Six Sigma projects. Over time, Six Sigma became deeply embedded in GE's company culture and is now a priority during company acquisitions. Six Sigma has proven applicable beyond engineering, benefiting various managerial roles and even individuals in service-oriented professions. Numerous other organizations across different sectors have also adopted Six Sigma and reported considerable success [16](#page=16) [17](#page=17).
#### 3.1.2 Principles of Six Sigma
Six Sigma has evolved from a manufacturing-focused defect reduction strategy to a comprehensive business strategy for accelerating improvements across an organization. It integrates traditional statistical methods and quality improvement tools with a distinct approach from earlier TQM practices. The core principles of Six Sigma include [18](#page=18):
1. **Focus on key business processes and customer requirements**: Aligning efforts with overall strategic objectives [18](#page=18).
2. **Involvement of corporate sponsors**: These leaders champion projects, support teams, facilitate change, and secure resources [18](#page=18).
3. **Emphasis on quantifiable measures**: Applying metrics like dpmo across all organizational areas, including manufacturing, administration, and software [18](#page=18).
4. **Identification of appropriate metrics**: Ensuring metrics are business-result-oriented and provide incentives and accountability [18](#page=18).
5. **Extensive training and project deployment**: Training employees to improve profitability, reduce non-value-added activities, and shorten cycle times [18](#page=18).
6. **Development of process improvement experts**: Creating highly qualified individuals (Green Belts, Black Belts, Master Black Belts) to lead teams and apply improvement tools [18](#page=18).
7. **Setting stretch objectives**: Establishing ambitious goals for improvement [18](#page=18).
Six Sigma differs from Total Quality Management (TQM) in several ways:
* **Ownership**: TQM relies on worker empowerment and teams, while Six Sigma is driven by business leader champions [18](#page=18).
* **Scope**: TQM activities are often function-specific, whereas Six Sigma projects are cross-functional [18](#page=18).
* **Methodology**: TQM training typically covers basic tools, while Six Sigma employs rigorous statistical methods and the DMAIC methodology [18](#page=18).
* **Accountability**: TQM focuses on improvement with less financial accountability, whereas Six Sigma demands verifiable return on investment (ROI) and a focus on the bottom line [18](#page=18).
Six Sigma can be seen as the realization of many TQM concepts, particularly the integration of human and process elements. It elevates the importance of statistics and statistical thinking in quality improvement and is characterized by its focus on measurable bottom-line results, a disciplined statistical approach, rapid project completion, and a structured organizational infrastructure [18](#page=18).
#### 3.1.3 The statistical basis of 3.4 dpmo
The term "Six Sigma" refers to a quality level of at most 3.4 defects per million opportunities (dpmo). This metric is based on the statistical assumption that processes are normally distributed and centered on a target specification. A key aspect is the consideration of process drift; Motorola's analysis revealed that processes typically drift by an average of 1.5 standard deviations under normal control. Allowing for this shift, the tail area of the distribution beyond the specification limit (which is six standard deviations from the target) equates to 0.0000034, or 3.4 parts per million [18](#page=18) [19](#page=19).
A "k-sigma quality level" is defined by the equation:
$$k \times \sigma = \frac{\text{tolerance range}}{2}$$
where $\sigma$ is the process standard deviation. For a six-sigma level, $k=6$, and with a tolerance range of $12\sigma$ (implying a process capability index $C_p = 2.0$), the equation holds true. A Six Sigma process, even with a mean shift of 1.5 standard deviations, produces at most 3.4 dpmo. Any process achieving less than 3.4 dpmo is considered to have six-sigma capability, regardless of whether it produces measurable characteristics or countable attributes. Processes with higher defect levels have lower sigma capabilities [19](#page=19) [20](#page=20).
Table 2 (not provided in document) would typically summarize the relationship between sigma capabilities and the proportion of defectives produced. The statistical calculations for these figures involve finding probabilities under the normal curve, considering a shift of 1.5 standard deviations from the mean [20](#page=20).
The difference in outcomes between sigma levels can be substantial:
* A four-sigma level in a cellular phone system could result in over four hours of service interruption monthly, whereas six sigma would mean only about 9 seconds [21](#page=21).
* A four-sigma process might yield one nonconforming package per three truckloads, while a six-sigma process would have only one nonconforming package in over 5,000 truckloads [21](#page=21).
* For a golfer playing 100 rounds annually, a six-sigma level implies missing one putt every 163 years [21](#page=21).
Not all processes require a six-sigma level; the appropriate level depends on the strategic importance of the process and the cost of improvement versus the benefit. Improvement effort increases significantly with higher sigma levels: moving from three to four sigma represents a tenfold improvement in dpmo, four to five sigma a thirty-fold improvement, and five to six sigma a seventy-fold improvement [21](#page=21).
While initially a manufacturing concept, Six Sigma has been operationalized for any process, signifying a general quality level of at most 3.4 dpmo. Even without understanding the statistical details, the term "six-sigma" has become synonymous with near perfection in organizations like Motorola [21](#page=21).
### 3.2 Implementing Six Sigma
#### 3.2.1 Project Selection
The initial step in Six Sigma implementation is selecting an appropriate problem. Not all problems are suitable for Six Sigma methodology. Problems are defined as deviations between desired and actual performance significant enough to warrant correction. Quality problem-solving cases generally fall into five categories [21](#page=21):
1. **Conformance problems**: Unsatisfactory performance leading to customer dissatisfaction, such as defects or service failures. These processes are typically well-specified and easily described [21](#page=21).
2. **Efficiency problems**: Unsatisfactory performance impacting non-customer stakeholders (e.g., managers), characterized by high costs, excessive inventory, or low productivity [22](#page=22).
3. **Unstructured performance problems**: Unsatisfactory performance from processes that are not well-specified or understood, such as high employee turnover or low satisfaction [22](#page=22).
4. **Product design problems**: Designing new or redesigning existing products to better meet customer needs [22](#page=22).
5. **Process design problems**: Designing new or substantially revising existing processes, such as new factory processes or more flexible assembly lines [22](#page=22).
Six Sigma methods are most effective for conformance problems where processes are easily identified, measured, analyzed, and changed [22](#page=22).
Projects are the fundamental vehicles for organizing and implementing Six Sigma. Effective project management is crucial to avoid common failure points like schedule adherence issues, poor planning, scope creep, skill mismatches, and insufficient knowledge transfer [22](#page=22).
#### 3.2.2 Project Management and Organization
Six Sigma projects require flexibility and cross-functional teams to complete significant work efficiently, but coordination with normal work activities is essential. Project teams need allocated slack time, physical, and financial resources; team members cannot be expected to handle full routine workloads and participate effectively in projects simultaneously [22](#page=22).
Teams are vital due to the interdisciplinary nature of Six Sigma projects, requiring diverse skills in technical analysis, creative solution development, and implementation. Six Sigma teams also provide an environment for individual learning, management development, and career advancement [23](#page=23).
The primary roles within Six Sigma teams are:
* **Champions**: Senior managers who champion Six Sigma, select projects, set objectives, allocate resources, and mentor teams. They own projects and are responsible for their outcomes [23](#page=23).
* **Master Black Belts**: Full-time Six Sigma experts responsible for strategy, training, mentoring, deployment, and results. They provide advanced technical expertise and coach teams across the organization but are typically not project team members [23](#page=23).
* **Black Belts**: Fully trained Six Sigma experts who perform technical analysis, often full-time. They possess advanced knowledge of tools and DMAIC, usually lead project teams, and mentor Green Belts [23](#page=23).
* **Green Belts**: Functional employees trained in introductory Six Sigma tools and methodology who work on projects part-time, assisting Black Belts and developing their own expertise. Completing a project is often a requirement for designation [23](#page=23).
* **Team Members**: Individuals from various functional areas who support specific projects [23](#page=23).
Significant training is required for Green, Black, and Master Black Belts. Cooperation, communication, and clarity are critical for Six Sigma team structures, with failures often attributed to team mechanics rather than project selection or tool usage [23](#page=23).
#### 3.2.3 Generating and Selecting Six Sigma Projects
Six Sigma projects can be generated through two approaches:
* **Top-down**: Projects are aligned with business strategy and customer needs. A weakness is their potential for being too broad, leading to timely completion issues, and senior managers may underestimate costs or overestimate team capabilities [24](#page=24).
* **Bottom-up**: Black Belts or Master Black Belts select projects suited to team capabilities. A drawback is that these projects may not align with top management's strategic concerns, potentially leading to less support [24](#page=24).
The most effective approach combines executive champions' strategic perspective with technical experts' input to choose relevant projects that fit team capabilities [24](#page=24).
Factors to consider when selecting Six Sigma projects include:
* **Financial return**: Measured by costs associated with quality and process performance, and impacts on revenues and market share [24](#page=24).
* **Impacts on customers and organizational effectiveness** [24](#page=24).
* **Probability of success** [24](#page=24).
* **Impact on employees** [24](#page=24).
* **Fit to strategy and competitive advantage** [24](#page=24).
Projects are driven by expected financial returns, with justification often found in reducing costs of poor quality (e.g., scrap, rework, delays). Six Sigma emphasizes external benefits like increased revenues from improved quality and customer satisfaction, an approach known as return on quality (ROQ). ROQ is based on four principles: quality as an investment, financial accountability for quality efforts, the possibility of overspending on quality, and the differential strategic importance of various quality expenditures [24](#page=24) [25](#page=25).
Senior managers must accurately estimate the resources required for projects to achieve desired bottom-line returns. Projects should aim for improved customer satisfaction and organizational performance, directly leading to higher sales or market share. Projects with a high likelihood of success should be chosen, with "low-hanging fruit" (easy-to-accomplish projects) beneficial for demonstrating early successes and building momentum [25](#page=25).
Effective project management is crucial as many projects run over budget, behind schedule, or fail to achieve desired outcomes. Six Sigma projects should align with the capabilities of the people and teams involved. Indirect benefits include enhanced employee and organizational knowledge from training, improved team and leadership skills, and increased employee motivation and satisfaction. Projects that reduce frustration with inadequate work processes or provide increased customer value are also important candidates [25](#page=25).
Ultimately, Six Sigma projects must support the organization's vision and competitive strategy. Project selection can sometimes be influenced by politics, but an objective approach using rational criteria and guiding by project steering committees with senior leadership representation is more effective. At Xerox, project identification is based on customer experience improvement, strategic plan alignment, business gap closure, and key process improvement areas, with selection based on potential business impact versus estimated effort [25](#page=25) [26](#page=26).
Project selection matrices and scoring models can be used to objectively evaluate and prioritize projects by considering customer importance ratings and other criteria, thereby removing guesswork and focusing on key organizational and customer issues [27](#page=27).
#### 3.2.4 The DMAIC process
The DMAIC process is a data-driven improvement cycle used in Six Sigma projects. It requires critical thinking, pertinent questioning, and the application of various tools and techniques. Many DMAIC tools have been in use for decades, including the "Magnificent Seven" (flowcharts, check sheets, histograms, Pareto diagrams, cause-and-effect diagrams, scatter diagrams, and control charts), which are simple, visual, and easy to interpret. Six Sigma curricula integrate these with advanced statistical methods, product design tools, measurement system analysis, process control, process improvement techniques, and implementation/teamwork strategies [27](#page=27) [28](#page=28).
The five phases of DMAIC are:
##### 3.2.4.1 Define
The Define phase focuses on clearly defining the problem after a Six Sigma project has been selected. This involves moving beyond vague problem statements to operational terms that facilitate further analysis. Project scoping involves drilling down to a more specific problem statement, such as "reduce the variability of brush hardness" [29](#page=29).
A fundamental understanding of the process driving results is essential, which can be achieved through process mapping and flowcharting. A high-level process map used in this phase is the SIPOC diagram (Suppliers-Inputs-Process-Outputs-Customers). SIPOC maps provide an overview of key process elements, including process ownership, input acquisition, and how value is added for customers [29](#page=29).
Pareto analysis is a useful tool for identifying the most important issues among symptoms, based on the Pareto principle that a few causes are responsible for a high proportion of problems. A Pareto diagram graphically displays this distribution, ordering characteristics from largest frequency to smallest, allowing for quick identification of the most frequent defect types and separating the "vital few" from the "trivial many". While Pareto charts identify frequent issues, they do not automatically pinpoint the most important defects. Variations include stacked Pareto charts that break down defects by source, such as a specific supplier. Pareto charts are widely used in both manufacturing and non-manufacturing applications [30](#page=30) [31](#page=31).
The Define phase also addresses project management aspects, typically documented in a formal **project charter**. A project charter defines the project, its objectives, deliverables, and serves as a contract between the team and sponsor, including the problem statement, objectives, team members, customers, CTQs, existing measures, expected benefits, financial justification, timeline, and resources. Cost of quality analysis is often used to quantify benefits [31](#page=31).
##### 3.2.4.2 Measure
The Measure phase focuses on understanding process performance and collecting necessary data for analysis. It uses the concept of a function $Y = f(X)$, where $Y$ represents critical to quality characteristics (CTQs) and $X$ represents critical input variables influencing $Y$. Understanding these relationships helps define experiments and identify factors for monitoring and control in the Control phase [32](#page=32).
Key questions in this phase include:
* What questions need to be answered [32](#page=32)?
* What type of data is needed [32](#page=32)?
* Where can the data be found [32](#page=32)?
* Who can provide the data [32](#page=32)?
* How can data be collected with minimum effort and error [32](#page=32)?
Developing operational definitions for all performance measures is crucial to ensure data is meaningful and unambiguous. Process capability analysis, descriptive statistics, frequency distributions, and histograms provide baseline measures of process performance. Benchmarking compares current performance to best-in-class, and measurement system analysis is vital to ensure data validity and reliability [32](#page=32).
Data collection forms include:
* **Data sheets**: Simple columnar or tabular forms [32](#page=32).
* **Check sheets**: Special data collection forms where results can be interpreted directly, aiding in summarizing historical data and identifying trends or patterns. They can be designed to create histograms of continuous measurements and include specification limits for process capability evaluation [33](#page=33).
Run charts plot data over time to show trends in average values or variability, useful in the Control phase to demonstrate improvement effects [34](#page=34).
##### 3.2.4.3 Analyze
The Analyze phase focuses on identifying the root causes of defects, errors, or excessive variation. A common flaw in problem-solving is jumping to solutions without a full understanding of the problem. This phase typically involves detailed process mapping, expanding on the SIPOC diagram from the Define phase [34](#page=34).
A **value stream map** is a specialized process map that visualizes all activities in designing, producing, and delivering goods/services, including material flow, transformation activities, and information flow. Value stream maps highlight value-added versus non-value-added activities and their associated times, allowing for comparison with the takt time (available work time divided by required production volume). They can also include information on machine uptime, reliability, process capacity, and batch sizes [34](#page=34).
Reasons for defects, errors, or excessive variation often stem from:
* Lack of knowledge about how a process works or should work [35](#page=35).
* Lack of control over materials and equipment [35](#page=35).
* Inadvertent errors in performing work [35](#page=35).
* Waste and complexity, such as unnecessary steps or excess inventories [35](#page=35).
* Hasty design, inadequate testing, or poor specifications [35](#page=35).
* Failure to understand process capability [35](#page=35).
* Lack of training [35](#page=35).
* Poor instrument calibration or inadequate environmental conditions [35](#page=35).
The goal of problem-solving is to identify and correct **root causes**, defined as conditions that, once corrected, permanently prevent recurrence of a defect [35](#page=35).
Tools for root cause analysis include:
* **"5 Why" technique**: Asking "why" repeatedly (ideally five times) to trace symptoms back to the fundamental cause [35](#page=35).
* **Cause-and-effect diagram (Ishikawa or fishbone diagram)**: A graphical method to present chains of causes and effects and organize relationships between variables. It's used in brainstorming to generate potential causes, categorized into major branches like People, Process, Materials, Machines, Environment, and Management [36](#page=36).
* **Scatter diagram**: A plot used to identify potential relationships between two variables by plotting data pairs. While not rigorous statistical analysis, it can indicate important relationships that may warrant further investigation with designed experiments to verify causality. A scatter diagram shows correlation, but correlation does not necessarily imply causation [37](#page=37).
Experiments are often conducted to verify potential cause-and-effect relationships using statistical inference [36](#page=36).
##### 3.2.4.4 Improve
In the Improve phase, Six Sigma teams generate and evaluate ideas to remove or resolve the problem and enhance performance measures and CTQs. This phase requires creativity, with a focus on deferring judgment and generating a large number of ideas [38](#page=38).
Tools and techniques for idea generation include:
* **Brainstorming**: A group problem-solving procedure that encourages generating a large volume of ideas without criticism, including "wild" ideas, and building upon existing ones [38](#page=38).
* **Checklists based on Osborn's principles**: A set of fundamental questions (e.g., Put to other uses, Adapt, Modify, Magnify) designed to stimulate new ideas by consciously changing existing concepts [38](#page=38).
After generating ideas, evaluation and selection of the most promising ones are necessary. Tools like Design of Experiments and the Deming cycle are useful for this. This includes confirming that proposed solutions positively impact key process variables and CTQs and identifying acceptable ranges for these variables. Mistake-proofing, such as **poka-yoke**, is often used as a final step [38](#page=38).
Decision or scoring models are frequently used to assess possible solutions against criteria like cost, time, quality improvement potential, resources required, effects on stakeholders, and barriers to implementation. Effective implementation requires assigning clear responsibility for executing the solution [39](#page=39).
##### 3.2.4.5 Control
The Control phase focuses on sustaining the improvements made. This involves implementing tools to ensure key variables remain within acceptable ranges under the modified process. Control measures can include establishing new standards and procedures, training the workforce, and instituting ongoing controls such as checklists, periodic reviews, or control charts to monitor key performance measures [39](#page=39).
---
## Common mistakes to avoid
- Review all topics thoroughly before exams
- Pay attention to formulas and key definitions
- Practice with examples provided in each section
- Don't memorize without understanding the underlying concepts
Glossary
| Term | Definition |
|------|------------|
| Quality Management System (QMS) | A structured system of documented policies, procedures, and responsibilities designed to achieve an organization's quality objectives and ensure customer satisfaction. It encompasses all aspects of how an organization operates to manage quality. |
| Total Quality Management (TQM) | A people-focused management system aiming for continual increase in customer satisfaction at continually lower real costs. It is an integrated, strategic approach that involves all employees and extends across the entire supply chain. |
| Six Sigma | A business improvement approach focused on identifying and eliminating the causes of defects and errors in processes by concentrating on outputs critical to customers and achieving a clear financial return. It is statistically defined as 3.4 or fewer errors per million opportunities (dpmo). |
| Customer Focus | A principle emphasizing that the customer is the ultimate judge of quality, requiring organizations to understand and meet customer needs and expectations, build relationships, and measure satisfaction. |
| Leadership (in Quality) | The responsibility of top management to set direction, create a customer orientation, establish clear quality values, and foster a culture of participation, learning, and innovation throughout the organization. |
| Involvement of People | A principle recognizing that a company's success depends on the knowledge, skills, and motivation of its workforce, advocating for employee engagement, teamwork, and empowerment to foster creativity and responsibility. |
| Process Approach | Viewing an organization as a system of interconnected activities that are intended to achieve specific results, focusing on horizontal or cross-functional workflows rather than solely on hierarchical structures. |
| Systems Approach to Management | An approach that views an organization holistically, aligning plans, processes, measures, and actions across all components to achieve overarching objectives and ensure coordinated operation towards success. |
| Continual Improvement | An ongoing effort to enhance products, services, and processes through both incremental changes and breakthrough innovations, aiming to eliminate problems at their source and continuously improve performance. |
| Factual Approach to Decision Making | Utilizing data, measurements, and sound analytical approaches to understand trends, infer cause-and-effect relationships, and provide an objective foundation for learning and making informed decisions. |
| Mutually Beneficial Supplier Relationships | Developing partnerships with suppliers based on trust, open communication, and shared goals to achieve mutual advantages such as lower costs, improved quality, and innovation. |
| DMAIC | A data-driven problem-solving methodology used in Six Sigma, consisting of five phases: Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control, to systematically address and resolve process issues. |
| Define (DMAIC Phase) | The first phase of DMAIC, focused on clearly defining the problem, its scope, and objectives in operational terms to facilitate further analysis. |
| Measure (DMAIC Phase) | The phase in DMAIC where process performance is understood, and the necessary data is collected to quantify current performance and establish a baseline. |
| Analyze (DMAIC Phase) | The phase in DMAIC that focuses on identifying the root causes of defects, errors, or excessive variation within a process through detailed analysis and investigation. |
| Improve (DMAIC Phase) | The phase in DMAIC dedicated to generating and implementing solutions to address the identified root causes and improve process performance and key metrics. |
| Control (DMAIC Phase) | The final phase of DMAIC, focused on establishing mechanisms to sustain the improvements achieved, ensuring that the modified process remains stable and the gains are maintained over time. |
| dpmo (defects per million opportunities) | A statistical metric used in Six Sigma to quantify the quality level of a process, representing the number of defects or errors per million opportunities for a defect to occur. |
| SIPOC Diagram | A high-level process map used in the Define phase of DMAIC, standing for Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers, which provides a broad overview of the key elements within a process. |
| Pareto Analysis | A statistical technique that identifies the "vital few" causes that contribute to the majority of problems, helping to prioritize improvement efforts by focusing on the most significant factors. |
| Cause-and-Effect Diagram (Ishikawa/Fishbone Diagram) | A graphical tool used to identify and organize potential causes of a problem, illustrating the relationship between effects and their contributing factors, often categorized into major areas like people, process, equipment, materials, environment, and management. |
| Scatter Diagram | A graphical tool used to investigate the relationship between two variables by plotting paired data points, helping to identify potential correlations or patterns that may indicate a cause-and-effect relationship. |
| Brainstorming | A group creativity technique used for generating a large number of ideas by encouraging participants to freely suggest solutions without criticism, often leading to novel and effective approaches. |
| Mistake-Proofing (Poka-Yoke) | A mechanism or device designed to prevent errors from occurring or to make them immediately apparent, thereby eliminating defects at the source. |